State Senate Omnibus Energy Bill Bans Pipeline Tax and Requires Distribution Companies to Repair Grade 3 Leaks


Senator Michael O. Moore (D-Millbury) announced that the Massachusetts State Senate voted to engross an omnibus energy bill to diversify the state’s energy portfolio.  The legislation would procure additional clean energy resources to replace aging power plants that are going offline, and move the Commonwealth closer to its emissions reduction goals under the Global Warming Solutions Act.

“This legislation is yet another step forward toward achieving our clean energy goals,” said Sen. Moore.  “Massachusetts continues to be a leader in pursuing clean energy options and this legislation is evidence of our long term commitment toward the next generation of energy possibilities.  I am proud to continue my longstanding support for legislative initiatives that prioritize cost effectiveness for our residents, the preservation of our environment, and long term energy needs.”

“This is an energy bill with a climate focus,” said Senator Benjamin B. Downing (D-Pittsfield), who serves as Senate Chair of the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy. “In it, we help meet our climate requirements, confront retiring dirty power plants, and show that acting on climate is consistent with strengthening our economy.”

During the Senate debate, a Moore-sponsored amendment was adopted to clarify ambiguities with the existing bill.  In particular, Sen. Moore’s amendment would ensure that electric ratepayers from Massachusetts are the statutory beneficiaries of the energy bill.  Prior to the adoption of the amendment, the original bill may have been interpreted to apply to ratepayers living outside the Commonwealth who receive their electricity as part of a regional energy distribution network.

The bill requires electric distribution companies, in consultation with the Department of Energy Resources (DOER) to solicit long-term contracts for at least 2,000 megawatts of offshore wind by 2027. The bill calls for successive, staggered solicitations to keep costs down through competition. Additionally, distribution companies would be required to purchase a minimum of 12,450,000 megawatt-hours of clean energy from hydropower and other Class 1 resources such as onshore wind, solar, anaerobic digestion and energy storage.

Further, the bill increases the percentage of Class 1 renewable energy that must be purchased by retail electric suppliers under the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS) from an additional 1% annually to an additional 2% annually beginning in 2017, putting the state on track to reach an energy mix of 37% renewables by 2030. The bill also supports fuel cell and waste-to-energy technology by including them in the Alternative Portfolio Standard.

Massachusetts leads the nation in energy efficiency. The MassSave program offers free home energy audits provided through electric distribution companies and offer rebates and discounts for making energy-saving upgrades. The Senate bill would require that homes sold in the Commonwealth have such an audit at some point in the five years prior to the sale of a home and the energy rating, similar to a miles-per-gallon rating on a car, is disclosed at the time of the sale. This way, prospective buyers are made aware of the energy consumption, costs, and emissions of their home, and the ways to improve it. The bill further establishes a task force to develop recommendations for a next-generation energy efficiency program to be implemented at the expiration of the current 3-year efficiency plans.

Investments in energy storage help to maximize the value of new clean energy generation and reduce costs to consumers during peak energy usage. To that end, the bill tasks DOER to consider setting appropriate targets for distribution companies to procure cost-effective energy storage systems by 2020.

The bill also prohibits the Department of Public Utilities from approving contracts for pipeline capacity filed by electric companies, meaning electric ratepayers cannot be charged by their energy supplier to defray the costs of natural gas pipeline expansion.

Additional provisions of S. 2372 include:

  • Directing DOER to study the need to modernize the electric grid with the goal of reducing demand, reducing energy costs to ratepayers, integrating distributed energy resources, reducing carbon emissions, and enhancing reliability and resiliency;
  • Creating a small hydropower tariff program for hydropower facilities with 2MW capacity or less. Distribution companies would pay the facility monthly for electricity provided to the grid, with an aggregate capacity of 50 MW;
  • Clarifying the authority of the Attorney General’s Office of Ratepayer Advocacy to intervene in DPU proceedings, and, in exercising such authority, may retain experts and obtain information from companies subject to DPU’s jurisdiction;
  • Requiring gas distribution companies to repair grade 3 leaks identified as having a significant environmental impact when construction on a public way exposes such a leak, and directing DPU to investigate specific criteria for the identification of the environmental impact of gas leaks;
  • Establishing a separate net metering cap of 50 megawatts for energy generated by anaerobic digesters; and
  • Establishing an Oil Heat Energy Efficiency Fund into which funds are deposited and expended for providing financial incentives for residential and small business demand-side management programs that improve energy efficiency and reduce oil consumption for residential and commercial customers.

The Senate bill was offered as an amendment to the energy bill passed by the House of Representatives earlier this month. The bill will now go before a Conference Committee comprised of six legislators to resolve differences between versions of the budget passed by the House and Senate.


1 Comment

  1. So. The Bill went first to the House- which voted for none of this good stuff. The Senate’s version- voted for all of this good stuff, UNANIMOUSLY. The Conference committee (comprised of 6 legislators) has the task now of “resolving the differences”. Meaning they could gut all this, keep it, or keep only some. Here are their email addresses. PLEASE email them!!

Comments are encouraged! If this is your first time commenting (welcome!). Your email is required but not displayed. I ask town officials to use their real names.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s